ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Health consequences of spousal health shocks: evidence from a matched event study in the United States.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major disease diagnoses can create shocks that ripple through households. Population-level evidence in the US on how spouses and partners fare after a partner's major diagnosis remains sparse and is often limited to caregiver or employment-related outcomes. Using the US Health and Retirement Study (1992-2020), we evaluated population-level health spillovers to spouses after a partner's first diagnosis of cancer, stroke, or heart disease, employing a stacked event-study design with matching (n = 29 166). Outcomes included subjective health, doctor-diagnosed conditions, limitations in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL/IADL), and health behaviors and use of preventive care. We evaluated heterogeneity by sociodemographic and economic conditions. Spouses of newly diagnosed patients experienced modest but persistent declines: more frequent reports of poor health ($\boldsymbol{\beta}$ = .02, 95% CI, 0.00, 0.03), more doctor-diagnosed conditions ($\boldsymbol{\beta}$ = .05, 95% CI, 0.01, 0.08), and higher depressive symptoms ($\boldsymbol{\beta}$ = .08, 95% CI, 0.01, 0.16). Effects were greater among women whose male partners received a diagnosis and among spouses with lower education or fewer assets. Health and preventive care behaviors were largely unchanged. Findings motivate early, spouse-focused support and underscore the need for targeted interventions for spouses at highest risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.