ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Beyond disability: how being twice-marginalized shapes the experiences of STEM undergraduates with disabilities.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The experiences of marginalized students in higher education are often examined through a single-identity lens, overlooking how other identities can jointly shape their college experiences. In particular, little is known about how holding an additional marginalized identity affects the experiences of students with disabilities in STEM. We surveyed 947 undergraduates (379 with disabilities) at 85 institutions across the United States to (i) identify marginalized identities that are highly represented among students with disabilities and (ii) examine whether holding an additional marginalized identity corresponds to distinct experiences among students with disabilities. We found that LGBTQ+, nonbinary, and white students were overrepresented among students with disabilities relative to students without disabilities, with 50% of students with disabilities identifying as LGBTQ+. LGBTQ+ students with disabilities reported significantly more negative academic and social experiences than non-LGBTQ+ students with disabilities. These findings highlight some of the heterogeneity that exists in the experiences of students with disabilities, underscore the need to address the challenges faced by LGBTQ+ students with disabilities, and suggest that some patterns previously attributed to disability alone could be partly explained by the experiences of LGBTQ+ students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.