ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Microbiology students' relatability to scientists is impacted by scientists' identities and exposure to brief scientist highlights during class time.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Representation in the classroom and students' ability to relate to scientists are essential for promoting engagement and success in STEM programs. Incorporating information about scientists from diverse backgrounds in the form of assignments increases student relatability to scientists and changes students' views of who can be a scientist toward non-stereotypical identities. However, building new assignments in an already filled curriculum, and identifying scientists from marginalized backgrounds who specifically fit foundational topics in the General Microbiology classroom may be difficult. Here, we evaluated an intervention to increase representation in the classroom that can be easily incorporated during classroom time. We developed 15 short scientist highlights to accompany the content of a General Microbiology course. These highlights included scientists from historically marginalized backgrounds by gender, race/ethnicity, country of origin, and gender identity. Our main research question was to determine if this intervention could increase students' ability to relate to scientists and increase their sense of belonging. We used a modified survey based on Schinske et al. (J. Schinske, M. Cardenas, and J. Kaliangara, CBE Life Sci Educ 14:ar35, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-12-0231) and Estrada et al. (M. Estrada, A. Woodcock, P. R. Hernandez, and P. W. Schultz, J Educ Psychol 103:206-222, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020743) to measure relatability to scientists and sense of belonging as a construct of students' scientific identity. We demonstrate that showcasing scientists from marginalized backgrounds during lectures and without the need to incorporate related assignments can be a simple yet effective strategy to increase students' ability to relate to scientists, while a sense of belonging appears to be a more complex construct with other factors to consider. Additionally, while all students were interested in learning about scientists' contributions to science, those who identify as women were also interested in the scientists' identities, especially when those identities reflected their own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.