Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496084›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

Challenges and facilitators for meaningful and impactful stakeholder engagement in global health research.

Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah Adnani, Genevie Fernandes, Emma Kinley, Siân Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah AdnaniDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Genevie FernandesInternational Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Emma KinleyLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England, UK.
Siân WilliamsInternational Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly required in global health research, yet its implementation often remains underexamined, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Drawing on literature and experience from a multinational respiratory research programme, this viewpoint highlights how structural constraints, ethical ambiguity, power dynamics, and socio-cultural factors can undermine meaningful engagement. Without reflexive, adequately resourced, and institutionally supported approaches, stakeholder engagement risks becoming symbolic rather than transformative. Funders and institutions must therefore invest in flexible, long-term, and context-sensitive engagement models that genuinely reflect and respond to the communities global health research seeks to serve.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGlobal HealthStakeholder ParticipationDeveloping CountriesHumansethicsglobal healthLMIClow- and middle-income countryresearchrespiratory healthstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID42496084
PMCPMC13398158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.