ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Clinical Significance of Age and Coexisting Lifestyle-related Diseases in ILD Patients with Acute Exacerbation.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Assessment and Outcomes Across Respiratory Diseases.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs the population ages, the impact of aging and comorbid lifestyle-related diseases on the prognosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we investigated the impact of age and comorbidities on the prognosis of patients with ILD who experienced acute exacerbations (AEs). MATERIAL AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records and chest computed tomography scans of all consecutive ILD patients, with or without AE, between May 2015 and July 2025. The survival times of cases with and without AE were investigated.
resultsMedian survival time (MST) for 443 ILD cases was 10 years, while the MST for the 158 cases who developed AE was 2 months. The prognosis of cases who developed AE at age 80 years or older was significantly poorer than that of cases younger than 80 years. Among cases younger than 80 years, the survival curve for those who survived 3 months after the onset of AE plateaued. Favorable factors among cases who developed AE were age younger than 80 years and absence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and malignancy.
conclusionFor ILD patients who developed AE, "80 years of age" was the threshold age distinguishing good from poor prognosis. Some patients, particularly those with ILD who were diagnosed early, appeared likely to have an improved prognosis. Some AE patients, particularly younger patients, could be expected to have a good long-term prognosis if they survive a certain period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.