ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2026
Accelerating Research on Brain Aging: Enabling Brain Imaging Data Sharing in the Open Science Landscape.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global burden of age-associated diseases continues to grow. In particular, the accelerating impact of neurodegenerative diseases on individuals, communities and societies necessitates more effective approaches to diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of such disorders. Hence, the establishment of imaging biomarkers for early detection of disease, progression monitoring, and therapeutic evaluation is of utmost importance. Yet, despite the scientific consensus on the benefits of scientific collaboration and consequently medical innovation including biomarker development, substantial barriers for sharing neuroimaging data remain, demanding a transformation in how scientific data are generated, made accessible, re-used and valued. These barriers range from technical and infrastructural limitations to legal and motivational challenges that hinder widespread adoption of open science practices. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of brain imaging data sharing in neurodegenerative disease research. We explore the status of preregistration, data harmonization and storage standardization, legal compliance, and researcher incentives. We highlight best practices before, during and after data generation and the pressing need for a coordinated strategy regarding simplified and unified legal frameworks compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union. Finally, we advocate for the establishment of an academic credit system designed to reward data stewardship. Only with a combined effort from researchers, stakeholders and funding agencies including a sustained infrastructure investment and community education, the field can fully overcome inertia and move towards much-desired open science, thereby fully leveraging shared data to improve patient outcomes and scientific discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.