ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026
Blinded-Into-Unblinded Interim Analyses for Clinical Trials With Time-to-Event Endpoints.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A large proportion of clinical trials do not meet their recruitment targets. Trials using time-to-event endpoints come along with the additional complexity that the amount of available information depends on the number of observed events, which is random for a specified point in time. This means that even if a trial may have recruited the planned number of patients in its recruitment interval, the amount of available information at a fixed calendar time is random. The determination of the sample size underlying a clinical trial is a very important aspect when designing a trial. When adaptations of the pre-specified sample size are a desired design option to address the uncertainty of underlying assumptions, blinded interim analyses are recommended by the authorities. However, blinding cannot be assured when there is a high interest in a potential early trial stop or a high uncertainty about the underlying effect size. In those situations, (adaptive) group-sequential trial designs may be used. In this work, we propose a flexible, hybrid approach. Based on the chances of an early trial stop, either a blinded or an unblinded interim analysis is conducted such that the advantages of the two commonly applied approaches are combined. We focus on trials where the time to an event is the primary outcome. These studies usually come along with a long study duration, where the necessity of design adaptations may be especially appealing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.