ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Determinants Shaping Healthcare Experiences Among Vulnerable Populations in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundIn many urban Asian cities, healthcare experiences are situated at the intersection of infrastructure-dictated living, multilingual and aging populations, and pluralistic medical practices. In Hong Kong, these dynamics are intensified by socioeconomic inequality and long wait times for subsidized care within the public-private healthcare system. Few qualitative studies have examined how social, environmental, and healthcare system factors shape the experiences of vulnerable populations in this context against a multilevel framework. The study explored these determinants and their implications for adapting the Dahlgren and Whitehead rainbow model to a high-density urban Asian setting.MethodsTwenty-one semi-structured individual interviews with data saturation reached were conducted between August 2024 and March 2025 with participants purposively recruited through non-governmental organizations. The Human Research Ethics Committee at The University of Hong Kong provided ethical approval. Participants included older adults, low-income households, persons with disabilities or mental health conditions, caregivers, and ethnic minorities. Interviews were translated, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach.ResultsOur findings indicate that the original rainbow model does not fully capture the health determinants relevant to urban city settings. Specifically, it overlooks the impact of infrastructure on health; oversimplifies education by not accounting for health literacy and digital literacy, both of which are increasingly important for technology-based information seeking; and includes agriculture and food production, which are less applicable in urban contexts-therefore we propose reframing this as "food and nutrient." Additionally, our results highlight that family and culturally embedded social roles have a significant influence on health outcomes in urban environments.ConclusionBy integrating these localized structural and social dimensions, our adapted rainbow model captures the healthcare-seeking experiences and complex health determinants of vulnerable populations in urban Asia. This adaptation expands on the original framework by accounting for underlying systemic inequities, thus providing a more context-sensitive approach to understand and address these challenges through equitable policy and practice in Hong Kong and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.