Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495811›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2026

Beyond the Human Body: Models for Studying Neutrophil Biology.

Salem Hamdan, Malgorzata Wachowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Salem HamdanDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics and Clinical Immunology of Developmental Age, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Malgorzata WachowskaDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics and Clinical Immunology of Developmental Age, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are a key component of the immune system, integrating antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions through various strategies, including phagocytosis, degranulation, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Owing to their complexity and involvement in a wide range of conditions, including autoimmune diseases, neutrophils have emerged as a major focus of biomedical research. However, it should be noted that neutrophil studies face significant challenges, including short lifespan, terminal differentiation, tendency to spontaneous activation, and donor variability. Moreover, resistance to genetic modifications limits the detailed investigation of gene function and signaling pathways in neutrophil biology. To overcome these constraints, a range of experimental models has been developed. In this review, we present a guide to the currently available neutrophil models (HSPC, iPSC, HL-60, PLB-985, NB4, Kasumi-1, ER-Hoxb8), highlighting their strengths and limitations, with particular emphasis on their value as genetically modifiable platforms. Additionally, we provide an insight into the mechanisms governing neutrophil effector functions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeutrophilsAnimalsExtracellular TrapsHumansPhagocytosisReactive Oxygen SpeciesReactive Oxygen SpeciesdegranulationgranulopoiesisHL‐60/PLB‐985/NB4/ER‐Hoxb8/iPSC‐derived neutrophilsinnate immunityneutrophil effector functionsneutrophil extracellular trapsneutrophil‐like cellsneutrophilsphagocytosisreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID42495811
PMCPMC13542781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.