ReviewCogent mental health2026
Early interventions for self-harm among children and young people in educational and primary-care settings: a scoping review.
Review in Cogent mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-harm among children and young people is a major public-health concern associated with substantially elevated risk of adverse outcomes including suicide. Educational and primary-care settings are frequent points of contact, prompting diverse prevention and early-intervention efforts, yet the scope and effectiveness of these remain unclear. This scoping review mapped and synthesised empirical studies evaluating interventions designed to prevent or reduce self-harm in individuals aged 25 years or younger within educational or general-practice contexts. Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance, seven databases and grey-literature sources were searched to July 2025. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria: five randomised controlled trials, five other quantitative evaluations, four mixed-methods studies, seven qualitative enquiries, and one implementation report. Most were delivered in educational settings; primary care remained under-represented. Psycho-educational programmes were most common, followed by screening or early-identification approaches, mindfulness or expressive-therapeutic interventions, an integrated service model, professional training, and a digital self-help app. Of twelve studies with quantitative outcomes, four reported significant reductions in self-harm thoughts or behaviours, although most were small-scale and short-term. Adverse-event reporting and harm monitoring were limited. Evidence indicates potential benefits of psycho-educational and brief psychotherapeutic interventions in schools, but further multi-site trials with longer follow-up and robust harm-monitoring protocols are needed, particularly within primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.