ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Artificial Intelligence-Based Surgical Phase Analysis Enables Objective Assessment of Surgeon Skill in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based surgical video analysis can automate time-consuming manual assessments and enable objective characterization of surgical workflows. We aimed to construct a large, multicenter, fully annotated dataset of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) videos and evaluate the feasibility and performance of an AI model for surgical phase recognition. We further explored whether AI-derived phase-specific metrics could characterize phase-level performance differences according to surgeon experience. Methods: We developed an image classification model to automatically identify surgical phases in RDG videos. Experienced gastric surgeons annotated nine predefined surgical phases on a frame-by-frame basis (1 fps). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. In an exploratory analysis, the duration of each AI-predicted surgical phase was quantified and compared according to each surgeon's robotic case volume. Results: We analyzed 137 RDG videos collected from 15 institutions. The nine-phase recognition model achieved an overall accuracy of 87.0%. Among the surgical phases, the AI-predicted duration of right-sided greater curvature lymphadenectomy was shorter for surgeons with higher robotic case volume than those with lower volume (3789 vs. 2547 frames, Conclusions: The proposed AI model demonstrated robust performance in multicenter surgical phase recognition. AI-based surgical phase analysis enabled objective characterization of phase-specific operative profiles according to surgeon experience. These findings support the feasibility of surgical phase analysis as an exploratory framework for performance profiling and educational support in robotic gastrectomy. However, generalizability may be limited owing to institutional overlap between the training and validation datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.