Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495660›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based Surgical Phase Analysis Enables Objective Assessment of Surgeon Skill in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study.

Masaru Komatsu, Daichi Kitaguchi, Yoichi Ninomiya, Yuya Takabe, Mitsumasa Yoshida, Masahiro Yura, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Takahiro Kinoshita, Masaaki Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masaru KomatsuGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Daichi KitaguchiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-6317
Yoichi NinomiyaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Yuya TakabeGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Mitsumasa YoshidaGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Masahiro YuraGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeshitaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Takahiro KinoshitaGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-2707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based surgical video analysis can automate time-consuming manual assessments and enable objective characterization of surgical workflows. We aimed to construct a large, multicenter, fully annotated dataset of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) videos and evaluate the feasibility and performance of an AI model for surgical phase recognition. We further explored whether AI-derived phase-specific metrics could characterize phase-level performance differences according to surgeon experience. Methods: We developed an image classification model to automatically identify surgical phases in RDG videos. Experienced gastric surgeons annotated nine predefined surgical phases on a frame-by-frame basis (1 fps). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. In an exploratory analysis, the duration of each AI-predicted surgical phase was quantified and compared according to each surgeon's robotic case volume. Results: We analyzed 137 RDG videos collected from 15 institutions. The nine-phase recognition model achieved an overall accuracy of 87.0%. Among the surgical phases, the AI-predicted duration of right-sided greater curvature lymphadenectomy was shorter for surgeons with higher robotic case volume than those with lower volume (3789 vs. 2547 frames, Conclusions: The proposed AI model demonstrated robust performance in multicenter surgical phase recognition. AI-based surgical phase analysis enabled objective characterization of phase-specific operative profiles according to surgeon experience. These findings support the feasibility of surgical phase analysis as an exploratory framework for performance profiling and educational support in robotic gastrectomy. However, generalizability may be limited owing to institutional overlap between the training and validation datasets.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkrobotic distal gastrectomysurgical phase recognition

Identifiers

PMID42495660
PMCPMC13394591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.