ArticleLiver cancer2026
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Lenvatinib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stratified by the CRAFITY Score: An International Multicenter Study.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) is the most widely used first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while lenvatinib remains a standard alternative. Previous studies suggest limited efficacy of Atezo+Bev in patients with HCC exhibiting a CRAFITY score of 2 (CRP ≥1 mg/dL and AFP ≥100 ng/mL). We conducted an international collaborative study to compare the efficacy of Atezo+Bev and lenvatinib stratified by the baseline CRAFITY score. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 994 patients who initiated Atezo+Bev or lenvatinib as first-line therapy for unresectable HCC between September 2017 and March 2024 across 11 hospitals in Japan and 13 hospitals in Taiwan. Patients were categorized by baseline CRAFITY score, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between treatment groups. Results: The median age of the patients was 71 years, and 770 (77.5%) were male. The baseline CRAFITY score was 0 in 375 patients (37.7%), 1 in 402 patients (40.4%), and 2 in 217 patients (21.8%). In patients with a CRAFITY-0 score, median PFS (10.8 vs. 9.4 months; Conclusion: Lenvatinib was associated with significantly longer PFS than Atezo+Bev in patients with a baseline CRAFITY score of 2. The CRAFITY score may be useful for identifying patients in whom lenvatinib could be considered as a first-line option, and prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.