ArticleParkinson's disease2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies That Target Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.
Article in Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies That Target Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with no currently approved disease-modifying therapies. Alpha-synuclein targeting monoclonal antibodies provide a potential therapeutic strategy. Objectives: To evaluate published studies of the efficacy and/or safety of monoclonal antibodies that target alpha-synuclein in human subjects. Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles was conducted. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched up to March 2, 2025. Results were synthesised narratively. Risk of bias was assessed, and sensitivity analysis excluding studies with high risk was performed. Results: After screening 1509 papers, 10 publications incorporating a total of 13 studies were included. These assessed Prasinezumab, Cinpanemab, Exidavnemab and Lu-AF82422 with heterogeneity amongst studies. Tolerability was generally favourable across all studies. Cinpanemab showed almost no efficacy, whilst Prasinezumab demonstrated mixed motor symptom improvements. Safety profiles for all monoclonal antibodies reflected mostly consistent rates of adverse events. Six studies were removed in the sensitivity analysis due to high risks of bias, which reduced Prasinezumab's apparent efficacy findings. Conclusions: The efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in Parkinson's disease remains uncertain with most positive results coming from the studies with high risks of bias. Prasinezumab demonstrated an efficacy profile with the potential of significance, warranting further research. This lack of efficacy reported with Cinpanemab is consistent with the manufacturer's decision to discontinue it. Safety data on Exidavnemab and Lu-AF82422 in healthy volunteers support further investigation in Parkinson's disease patients. Future trials may benefit from the inclusion of subjects at earlier disease stages, diagnosed before clinical features have emerged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.