ArticleiScience2026
Exploring prediction of tick and tick-borne encephalitis cases in Sweden using citizen science data.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) remains a severe public health threat in affected areas with shifting geographic distribution linked to environmental change. However, systematic tick surveillance is limited due to the cost and effort of field monitoring. Here, we evaluate the potential of using national citizen science tick data reports for predicting tick-human interaction and TBE risk alongside socioeconomic and environmental data. We integrate citizen science observations with socioeconomic and environmental data, and apply statistical and machine learning models to identify key drivers and assess predictive performance. Among them, XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy for predicting tick report frequency and TBE cases. Rural population size, soil temperature, and vegetation index were key predictors of tick-human interaction, while tick report frequency, soil temperature, and diurnal temperature range were associated with TBE cases. These findings underscore the value of tick citizen science data for enhancing public health surveillance and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.