Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495500›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Improving Procedural Confidence: Outcomes of a Surgical Skills Workshop for Medical Students.

Mary Arden G Guillory, Jennifer Escamilla, Anika Doppalapudi, Ashlyn G Holubar, Kaitlyn D Ybanez, Mark Manickath, Maci Oestreich, Mckenna Stallworth, Kelsey Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary Arden G GuilloryMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Jennifer EscamillaMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Anika DoppalapudiMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Ashlyn G HolubarMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Kaitlyn D YbanezMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Mark ManickathMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Maci OestreichMedicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.
Mckenna StallworthMedicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Kelsey BakerNeuroscience, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Introducing surgical skills early in medical training may enhance students' confidence and readiness for clinical training. Simulation-based skill workshops provide students with a comfortable learning environment, resulting in effective learning. The goal of the Surgical Skills Workshop was to provide first- and second-year medical students with hands-on exposure to essential surgical skills. The educational impact on medical students' confidence in performing the respective surgical skills and changes in surgical career interest was assessed. Methods First- and second-year medical students at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine participated in a hands-on surgical skills workshop comprising eight stations: endotracheal intubation, suturing, sterile scrubbing and gowning, Foley catheter placement, venipuncture, intrauterine device insertion, laparoscopic simulation, and nasogastric tube insertion. Participants rotated through stations in small groups with instruction from residents and attending physicians. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed confidence in the respective surgical skill using a five-point Likert scale, as well as interest in a surgical career. Statistical comparisons were performed, with P <0.01 considered significant. Results Fifty-one students completed the pre-workshop survey, and 46 completed the post-workshop survey, with a response rate of 90%. Self-reported confidence increased significantly across nearly all assessed procedural skills following the workshop (P<0.01). The largest gains were observed in skills typically unfamiliar to preclinical students, including sterile scrubbing and gowning, nasogastric and endotracheal tube placement, and laparoscopic instrument handling. Interest in pursuing a surgical career did not change significantly following the event, likely because participants demonstrated high baseline interest prior to participation. However, the survey aimed not only to assess changes in interest level, but also whether early hands-on exposure to surgical skills reinforced, clarified, or negatively impacted students' perceptions of a surgical career. The absence of a decline in interest following realistic procedural exposure may suggest that the workshop helped consolidate pre-existing interest rather than substantially alter career intentions. Conclusions The Surgical Skills Workshop significantly improved preclinical medical students' perceived confidence across a broad range of surgical skills. While exposure to various surgical skills did not affect career interest, the simulation-based nature of the workshop fostered readiness for clinical clerkships. Future studies should incorporate objective performance measures to assess skill competence and broader student participation to better assess long-term career impacts.

Indexed as

early clinical exposuremedical simulation trainingpreclinical medical educationprocedural skills confidencesimulation-based educationsurgical career interestundergraduate medical educationworkshop-based learning

Identifiers

PMID42495500
PMCPMC13395551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.