ReviewCureus2026
Disparities in Sex-Based Health Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a chronic vascular condition that affects millions of individuals worldwide and is a significant burden on public health. Although female subjects may be at greater risk of developing PAD owing to sex-specific risk factors and frequently present with atypical symptoms, diagnosis rates are comparable between women and men. Treatment of PAD commonly relies on endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stenting, and atherectomy. While these interventions have proven effective, understanding sex-specific differences in outcomes has been insufficiently studied. This scoping review was conducted to assess the health outcomes of endovascular interventions for PAD in female subjects residing in the United States (US). A systematic search was performed across multiple databases, including EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria focused on studies published between 2016 and 2024, involving lower extremity PAD interventions across the US female populations. Studies evaluating non-US populations, pharmacological treatments, and asymptomatic individuals were excluded. Data extraction focused on key factors, including (1) complication rates, (2) need for reintervention, and (3) long-term health outcomes. Nine retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. We analyzed complications, reintervention rates, amputation risks, and mortality outcomes, revealing variation in findings. Five studies reported increased complications in female patients, such as arterial dissection and hematoma formation. Additionally, four studies showed higher rates of reintervention among female patients, while one found no significant sex-based differences in reintervention or complications. Similarly, while three studies identified a greater risk of amputation and mortality in female patients, two others revealed no disparities or better outcomes among female patients. The variability in outcome measures, study designs, and patient populations may have contributed to the inconsistencies across these findings. These varied findings highlight the need for more standardized research measures to accurately assess how sex-based differences impact PAD treatment outcomes. Further research is necessary to explore anatomical, physiological, and sociocultural factors contributing to these disparities and to improve treatment strategies for female patients with PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.