ArticleCureus2026
Tofacitinib as Rescue Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Observations on Cytomegalovirus Coinfection.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAcute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a severe and potentially life-threatening condition in which one-third of patients are refractory to intravenous corticosteroids. Established rescue therapies--infliximab and cyclosporine--are limited by cost, administration constraints, and toxicity. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, possesses pharmacokinetic and mechanistic properties that may be advantageous in the inpatient setting. This study was conducted to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of tofacitinib as rescue therapy in steroid-refractory ASUC and to identify clinical predictors of treatment failure.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with ASUC admitted to our tertiary gastroenterology unit between March 2023 and August 2025. ASUC was defined per Truelove and Witts' criteria. Patients who failed to respond to intravenous hydrocortisone by Day 3 and who could not receive infliximab (due to cost or contraindication) were initiated on tofacitinib (10 mg thrice daily for 3 days, followed by 10 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was clinical response by Day 5-7, defined as a reduction in Mayo score of ≥3 points (≥30% from baseline) with an absolute rectal bleeding sub-score of 0-1. Secondary outcomes included non-response rate, adverse events, and the impact of colonic cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA burden on treatment response.
resultsTen consecutive patients with steroid-refractory ASUC received tofacitinib rescue therapy. The mean age was 29.6 ± 9.1 years; 60% were male. Seven patients (70%) achieved clinical response within 5-7 days. Three patients (30%) failed to respond and required alternative rescue therapy or surgical consultation. CMV DNA was detected in the colonic tissue of four patients; both patients with high viral loads (>50,000 copies/mL) failed to respond to tofacitinib despite concurrent antiviral therapy. Adverse events were minimal; one patient developed bicytopenia of uncertain attribution.
conclusionTofacitinib demonstrated a 70% short-term clinical response rate in steroid-refractory ASUC, with an acceptable safety profile. Higher colonic CMV DNA appeared to be associated with a lower likelihood of clinical response; however, this observation requires validation with further research. Tofacitinib represents a viable, cost-effective rescue option, particularly in resource-limited settings or when conventional biologics are contraindicated. Prospective comparative studies are needed to define its optimal positioning within ASUC treatment algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.