ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026
An attention-based transfer learning framework for breast cancer classification in mammography under limited data conditions.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a leading cause of death for women worldwide. There is a critical need for an early and accurate diagnosis to improve survival rates. This study evaluates the performance of transfer learning-based MobileNetV2 and ResNet50 architectures for binary breast cancer classification using mammography images. To enhance channel-wise feature learning, the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) attention mechanism was integrated into the network and partial fine tuning was performed by only freezing the early layers of the model. Furthermore, gradient-weighted class activation mapping was applied to visualize the important regions of mammogram images responsible for the model's predictions. The performance evaluation was carried out on the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) binary, Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), INbreast, and Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) datasets using stratified k-fold cross-validation. The experimental results demonstrate that one of the proposed frameworks, MobileNetV2-SE, achieved mean classification accuracies of 99.14%, 93.53%, 92.35%, and 96.33% on the DDSM, INbreast, MIAS, and CLAHE-binary datasets, respectively. In comparison, the ResNet50-SE model attained mean accuracies of 100%, 88.89%, 71.60%, and 97.98% on the same datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the frameworks achieve reliable and competitive performance for breast cancer detection under realistic evaluation conditions and improve the diagnostic accuracy of mammogram classification. This work contributes to the field of medical image analysis and computer-aided diagnosis. Future work should focus on applying advanced class balancing methods to improve diagnostic accuracy and model robustness in a variety of medical imaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.