Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495352›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Condition Optimization in Diverse Amide Coupling Reactions.

Abhinav Sai Chalasani, Sourodeep Deb, Aarav Anand, Yuhan Li, Robert Downing, Edward Njoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abhinav Sai ChalasaniDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.
Sourodeep DebDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.
Aarav AnandDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.
Yuhan LiDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.
Robert DowningDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.
Edward NjooDepartment of Chemistry, Biochemistry & Physics, Aspiring Scholars Directed Research Program, Fremont, California 94539, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-8219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction optimization is a very time- and resource-intensive process, as optimal reaction conditions depend highly on specific electronic and steric properties of the substrate identity and require extensive fine-tuning of synthetic conditions to arrive at the highest-yielding conversions. Amide couplings, which comprise nearly 40% of synthetic transformations performed in a medicinal chemistry setting, present a particularly challenging context for predictive modeling given the diversity of coupling agents and reaction parameters that must be matched to substrate reactivity. Amide coupling reaction data is particularly well-suited for machine-learning approaches that predict optimal reaction conditions given a particular substrate feature set. Herein, we report a platform for standardizing and filtering open-source reaction data from the ORD (Open Reaction Database) and using this machine-readable data set of 3800 amide coupling reactions to evaluate 13 machine learning models. These include linear, tree-based, kernel method, instance-based, neural network, and ensemble architectures in the yield prediction and classification of coupling agents in amide coupling reactions. Yield prediction remained a difficult task because of the complexity of our reaction data, achieving

Identifiers

PMID42495352
PMCPMC13393360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.