Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495243›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Clinical analysis and follow up study of chronic granulomatous disease with neonatal onset.

Dongwei Zhang, Xuehua Xu, Huifeng Fan, Gan Zhou, Wenyan Li, Diyuan Yang, Peiqiong Wu, Gen Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dongwei ZhangGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuehua XuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huifeng FanGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gan ZhouGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenyan LiGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Diyuan YangGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peiqiong WuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gen LuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To address the existing gap in knowledge regarding the small subset of chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) patients who present during the neonatal period, this study aimed to characterize their clinical features, genetic profiles, and long-term prognosis. Methods: This study retrospectively selected CGD patients with neonatal onset who were diagnosed using neutrophil respiratory burst tests and genetic analysis at the Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, between January 2018 and September 2024. Results: This study included nine male patients diagnosed with CGD presenting with neonatal onset. The median age at onset was 20 days (7-23 days). Pneumonia was observed in eight patients (88.9%), with Aspergillus species detected in five of these cases (62.5%). The stimulation index (SI) in the neutrophil oxidative burst assay was significantly reduced. All nine patients exhibited hemizygous variants in the Conclusion: Patients with CGD presenting in the neonatal period predominantly harbor mutations in the

Indexed as

chronic granulomatous diseaseclinicalCYBBneonatalprognosis

Identifiers

PMID42495243
PMCPMC13391818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.