ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Exploring personal digital media environments: a configural approach to digital stress.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital stress is shaped by the processing demands embedded in everyday media environments, yet, these environments have not been empirically examined very much beyond general media use. Drawing on network theory, we conceptualize personal digital media environments as the ways in which individuals configure media use in relation to their social ties. The purpose of this study is to examine how network properties of these media configurations are associated with different forms of digital stress. Methods: Drawing on a network-based approach, we used a pilot sample of 793 and a test sample of 1,139 U.S. adults to compute three media configuration properties from their name-generated reported social ties (both strong and weak): size (the number of unique media), density (interconnection among unique media via social ties), and centralization (extent to which communication with one's social ties is concentrated across a small set of unique media). We also identify and justify five subdimensions of digital stress. We then tested hypotheses about how the properties associate with digital stress, using structural equation modeling. Results: Configuration properties explained additional variance in digital stress beyond general media use. Further, larger configurations were associated with greater communication overload, more deficient self-regulation, and higher self-presentation pressure; and greater centralization was associated with lower overconnectivity. Discussion: These findings advance understanding of personal digital media configurations and how they may relate to different forms of digital stress, and could inform interventions aimed at improving digital wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.