Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495232›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Personality, culture, and AI writing tool acceptance: a cross-cultural meta-analysis of big five traits and technology acceptance among university students.

Lin Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lin LiSchool of Foreign Languages, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence writing tools into higher education raises questions about whether personality traits and cultural context jointly shape students' technology acceptance. Methods: This cross-cultural meta-analysis synthesized 44 primary studies (187 effect sizes from 44 independent, non-overlapping samples totalling 14,594 students; per-dimension analytic samples ranged from Results: Openness ( Discussion: Personality-acceptance relationships are, at least in part, culturally contingent, and single-culture estimates may obscure meaningful heterogeneity. Practical implications for culturally differentiated AI integration strategies in higher education are discussed.

Indexed as

AI-assisted writingbig five personality traitscross-cultural meta-analysiscultural moderationhigher educationtechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42495232
PMCPMC13393459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.