ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The investigation of the basic psychological needs of athletes in the Turkish National Amputee Football Team: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to examine the experiences of athletes in the Turkish Amputee National Football Team regarding the dimensions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are their basic psychological needs. Method: The research was designed within the framework of a qualitative research approach, and the participant group consists of nine athletes who are actively involved in the Turkish Amputee National Football Team. The participants consist of individuals with different levels of amputation. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observations conducted during training and competition processes. The interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, and later transcribed into written texts. The obtained data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method. As a result of the analysis, five themes emerged: (1) autonomy and freedom of decision-making, (2) perception of competence and sense of achievement, (3) social bonds and belonging, (4) coping with disability and psychological resilience, and (5) performance pressure and internal-external tension. Results: The findings show that athletes' motivation and self-confidence increase when their autonomy is supported; however, external pressures can limit this process. It was determined that the perception of competence is strengthened through performance opportunities and experiences of success, while social bonds are shaped through belonging, trust, and feeling valued. However, it was also observed that belonging is not always inclusive and is constructed through selective relationships. In addition, the findings reveal that psychological resilience is not only an individual trait but is shaped by social relationships and the sporting context. It was determined that athletes continuously try to maintain a balance between performance expectations and their intrinsic motivation, and that this situation sometimes creates tension. Discussion: The findings further demonstrate that amputee football simultaneously functions as a context of empowerment and psychological pressure, where athletes negotiate autonomy, competence, and belonging under conditions shaped by performance expectations and social evaluation. As a result, the study reveals that amputee football is both an empowering and limiting field of experience for athletes, and that sports environments should be restructured in a way that supports psychological needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.