Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495198›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Embarrassment in consumer help-seeking: how power distance belief shapes service experiences.

Jixi Liang, Yao Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jixi Liang *School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.
Yao Qin *School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Consumer help seeking occurs every day. Prior researchers have primarily examined help seeking in non-routine service encounters, such as in the education, working organization, and mental health fields, yet remain largely underexamined in daily routine consumption encounters. This research filled this gap by investigating consumers' daily help-seeking behavior from a cultural perspective, that is, how consumers' power distance belief (PDB) influences their intentions to seek assistance from service employees. Methods: We conducted three between-subject experiments with two groups of subjects from different cultural background (Asia and the United States) and three types of distinct help-seeking scenarios in daily service encounters to verify our conceptual model. ANOVA and PROCESS macro employing the bootstrapping method were used to analyze the data. Results: In study 1 we found a negative relationship between PDB and consumers' help-seeking intention using a gym equipment usage setting. In study 2 we examined the mediating role of anticipated embarrassment using a Western dinner etiquette context. In study 3 we further established the moderating role of self-confidence using an ordering wine scenario. When high-PDB consumers are high in self-confidence, they perceive weaker embarrassment, which further increases their intention to seek help from service providers compared to those with low self-confidence, and thus the negative effect of PDB on help-seeking intention decreases. Conclusion: This research helps companies better understand consumers' help-seeking behavior from a cultural perspective and enables them to more accurately design service strategies during consumer-employee interactions.

Indexed as

anticipated embarrassmentconsumer help seekingpower distance beliefself-confidenceservice encounter

Identifiers

PMID42495198
PMCPMC13393460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.