Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495186›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026

Quantifying protein residues in APIs: Bradford assay mechanism and limitations, outperformed by HILIC-MS/MS.

Yangrui Zhang, Yizhen Liu, Yangyang Chen, Chen Guo, Fengting Ou, Junhuan Lin, Hanmeng Guo, Tao Ke, Lushan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yangrui ZhangInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yizhen LiuInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Yangyang ChenInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Chen GuoShenzhen Audencia Financial Technology Institute, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, China.
Fengting OuJinhua Institute of Zhejiang University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321036, China.
Junhuan LinInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Hanmeng GuoInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Tao KeInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Lushan YuInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular complexity of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) has increased over recent decades, with production largely relying on microbial processes such as fermentation. However, these processes introduce non-therapeutic protein impurities. Accurate quantification of protein impurities in APIs is critical, as underestimation risks safety and efficacy, while overestimation leads to costly over-purification. Here, we evaluated five conventional protein assays with diverse standards and found their accuracy compromised by protein structural diversity. To deconstruct the mechanism of this limitation, we examined the Bradford assay as a case study. Machine learning models trained on data from over 140 standards revealed that, beyond the known roles of basic and aromatic residues, other amino acids exert positive or negative effects on the Bradford assay response-as predicted by Lasso regression and validated with five designed peptides. Together with molecular docking and interaction analysis, which identified electrostatic interactions as the primary driving force, these findings collectively account for the inherent bias of such structure-dependent assays. The systematic evaluation and mechanistic insight prompted us to develop a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS) method for amino acid analysis, enabling accurate protein quantification at ppm levels in matrices. Applied to eight commercial APIs, the method revealed substantial variation in protein residue levels (9.53-5570 ppm). By providing precise measurement of protein impurities in small-molecule APIs, this study helps ensure drug safety and efficacy at no excessive purification costs, while also offering insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the Bradford assay.

Indexed as

Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)Bradford assayHILIC-MS/MSProtein residues

Identifiers

PMID42495186
PMCPMC13392951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.