Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495161›Full record

ArticleBJR case reports2026

Multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of uterine polypoid adenomyoma: a case report.

Alexandra Jade Davis, Erin Gomez

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BJR case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra Jade DavisThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3154-4886
Erin GomezThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine polypoid adenomyoma (UPA) is a rare focal form of adenomyosis that can present as an intracavitary lesion and pose a significant diagnostic challenge, often mimicking more common or concerning entities, such as endometrial polyps or uterine adenosarcoma. We describe the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with profound anemia (hemoglobin 3.9 g/dL) secondary to acute on chronic heavy vaginal bleeding. Multimodal imaging, including ultrasound and MRI, prompted the initial diagnosis of UPA, later supported by surgical pathology. Ultrasound demonstrated diffusely heterogeneous myometrial echotexture and multifocal "venetian blind" artifact consistent with adenomyosis. MRI revealed an ovoid lesion within the endometrial cavity containing numerous T2 hyperintense cystic foci and imaging characteristics similar to the junctional zone, consistent with a submucosal UPA. Management included blood transfusions, hormone therapy, and ultimately hysterectomy. This case serves to underscore the importance of a combined approach, including both multimodal imaging and histopathology, in guiding the accurate diagnosis and optimal management of UPA. It is also intended to increase awareness of this rare lesion and encourage its consideration in the differential diagnosis of intracavitary uterine masses, as it may have implications for treatment planning.

Indexed as

adenomyosiscase reportMRIpolypoid adenomyomaultrasounduterine mass

Identifiers

PMID42495161
PMCPMC13395283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.