ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Subthreshold violations of trajectory predictions are sensitive to TMS of cerebellum Crus I/II.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We recently suggested that when visual objects move towards each other, it may involve a trajectory prediction and sensory checking at the level of milliseconds. We examined this possibility by exploring the consequences of a sub-threshold manipulation of squares trajectories on a newly found illusion, i.e., the perception of a gap at the time of the collision. We first examined the consequences of the manipulation on the conscious illusion. In a more exploratory way, we studied the EEG correlates of the manipulation, as well as the impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the cerebellum (right Crus I/II). The TMS was a typical intermittent theta-burst stimulation, but only one sequence of around 3 min, compared with a placebo stimulation. All participants participated to two TMS sessions, in the sham-verum or in the verum-sham order. The trajectory manipulation occurred within less than 60 ms before the collision and reliably decreased the illusion rate. The results suggest that the prediction is temporarily stopped after the trajectory change. The illusion was accompanied by late positive ERP signals in CP4. The amplitude of these signals was modulated by TMS verum on the cerebellum, but only in the sham-verum order. As a whole the results are consistent with automatic verifications of the trajectory regularity at the millisecond level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.