ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Comparative evaluation of YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RT-DETR for automated microcarrier colonization assessment in bioreactor cell cultures.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring microcarrier colonization during mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) expansion in bioreactors is essential for process control. Current manual quantification methods are time-consuming, subjective, and prone to inter-operator variability. This study presents a proof-of-concept evaluation of deep learning-based object detection for automated microcarrier colonization quantification in bioreactor cell cultures. Methods: Three state-of-the-art architectures-YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RT-DETR-were compared within a unified experimental framework. A dataset of 699 fluorescence microscopy images containing 46,982 annotated microcarriers (classified as colonized or non-colonized) was used for training and evaluation. Model selection followed a three-stage Successive Halving Algorithm (SHA) strategy to efficiently identify the best-performing architecture across 12 configurations without requiring high-end computational infrastructure. COCO-pretrained transfer learning was applied across all models. Results: YOLOv8-l emerged as the top-performing model, achieving mAP50-95 of 0.855 on validation and 0.787 on test, with a colonization estimation error (Mean Absolute Error) of 11.75%. The dataset size proved sufficient for CNN-based architectures, while also revealing the higher data demands of transformer-based detectors. Discussion: These results demonstrate that automated deep learning pipelines can reliably quantify microcarrier colonization, offering a practical alternative to manual assessment in cell therapy manufacturing. The findings also suggest that newer YOLO models do not necessarily yield improvements in domain-specific biomedical tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.