ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
In Silico Modeling of Nanoparticle Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Systematic Review.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable prediction of nanoparticle (NP) transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is essential for designing effective central nervous system-targeted drug delivery systems. The BBB protects the brain but severely restricts the entry of therapeutic compounds, and fewer than 5% of candidate drugs reach the brain in pharmacologically meaningful amounts. NP-based delivery systems have emerged as a promising approach to overcome this limitation by enhancing drug stability, circulation, and BBB penetration. Experimental in vivo animal models and in vitro BBB assays provide valuable mechanistic insights but are costly, time-consuming, and limited in translational efficiency. In silico methodologies offer a complementary strategy by enabling efficient screening of NP designs, supporting interpretation of experimental data, and reducing dependence on animal models. This paper presents a systematic review of 56 peer-reviewed publications that applied computational methods to study NP transport across the BBB. The included works fall into 5 main categories: (a) molecular simulations, (b) quantitative structure-activity/property relationship models, (c) machine learning and deep learning approaches, (d) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, and (e) nanoinformatics frameworks. These approaches address key stages of NP transport, including protein corona formation, interactions with endothelial membranes, and translocation across the barrier. By comparing these diverse methods, this review highlights their complementary strengths and integration potential for improving permeability prediction. Together, they demonstrate how multiscale computational modeling enhances understanding of NP behavior at the BBB, supports more ethical and nonanimal research, and paves the way for artificial intelligence-guided design of brain-targeted nanomedicines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.