Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495065›Full record

ReviewEuropean cardiology2026

Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Device Selection and Risks.

Tommaso Fabris, Francesco Putortì, Giuseppe Tarantini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tommaso FabrisDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova Padova, Italy.
Francesco PutortìDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4830-0354
Giuseppe TarantiniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8177-2269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation, especially those at intermediate-to-high surgical risk. As TAVR indications expand, the patient population is progressively younger, increasing the likelihood of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) over time. This shift highlights the need for effective long-term management strategies. This review focuses on the evolving role of redo-TAVR, specifically the TAV-in-TAV approach, for managing BVF. Key challenges include coronary obstruction, valve migration and device selection. Preprocedural planning, particularly through advanced imaging techniques, such as CT, is critical if complications are to be minimised. This review discusses important technical considerations for TAV-in-TAV procedures, including valve sizing, implantation depth and the impact of valve design on coronary access. A multidisciplinary heart team is essential for assessing patient anatomy and appropriate device selection. Although outcomes appear promising, further research is required to refine procedural techniques and optimise long-term results for patients undergoing redo-TAVR.

Indexed as

Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacementTAV-in-TAVtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID42495065
PMCPMC13392300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.