Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42495054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Diffusion meets edge awareness: a unified framework for high-precision ultrasound nerve segmentation.

Tanaya Mahalanabis, OmKumar Chandra Umakanthan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanaya MahalanabisSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
OmKumar Chandra UmakanthanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nerve segmentation from ultrasound images is still challenging due to speckle noise, poor contrast, and unclear anatomical edges. These limitations have an adverse effect on deep learning segmentation models working on raw ultrasound data. Methods: In order to overcome these difficulties, a diffusion-guided edge-aware multi-channel segmentation approach that can take advantage of raw ultrasound images, diffusion-processed features, and edge information is proposed. Moreover, a new EdgeFusion-U-Net model is developed for integrating these complementary features. Experiments were performed on two benchmark datasets of ultrasound nerve segmentation and the proposed method was compared with other state-of-the-art techniques such as U-Net, Residual U-Net, UNet++, TransU-Net, nnU-Net, and Attention U-Net. Results: As evidenced by experiments, the proposed method shows better results than existing techniques. Our method reached Dice scores of 94.62% and 93.91% on two benchmark datasets, while baseline methods had about 83% and 84% Dice scores without applying diffusion denoising and edge fusion. Conclusion: It can be seen that incorporating diffusion filter-based speckle noise removal and edge-based feature fusion techniques helps to achieve better results in terms of boundary detection. This technique not only helps in obtaining accurate information about the nerves but can also be used to support computer-assisted clinical analysis using ultrasounds.

Indexed as

attention U-Netdiffusion-based denoisingedge fusionmulti-channel feature fusionultrasound image segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42495054
PMCPMC13391844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.