SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2026
Digital phenotyping for mental health conditions: a systematic review of implementation and application.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital phenotyping (DP) has emerged as a promising approach for monitoring mental health conditions using passive and active data from personal digital devices. However, existing research is highly fragmented, with variability in study settings, device choices, data collection procedures, preprocessing pipelines, and analytical strategies. This lack of methodological consistency limits reproducibility, comparability across studies, and the translation of DP into routine clinical practice. Objective: The objective of the article is to examine and synthesise the methodological approaches used to implement DP systems for mental health conditions, including setting, device selection, data collection procedures, data storage, preprocessing workflows, feature extraction, and analytical strategies. Methods: A systematic search across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar), including studies published till June 2025. We included primary empirical studies using smartphone or wearable-based DP in clinically diagnosed mental health populations. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Findings were synthesised using a narrative approach focused on implementation methodologies. Findings/results: Forty-seven studies were included, primarily conducted in high-income countries and focusing on conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Across studies, wide heterogeneity was observed in digital devices used, sensing modalities, preprocessing strategies, feature definitions, and analytical techniques. Conclusions: DP demonstrates potential. However, methodological heterogeneity, inconsistent reporting, and concentration of evidence in high-income settings constrain reproducibility and clinical translation. Developing standardised implementation and reporting protocols may enhance the reliability of DP and facilitate its integration into routine mental health care. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023406094, PROSPERO CRD42023406094.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.