ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
HAMAgent: human assisted multiagent system for emotion recognition and digital health-a survey and preliminary study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study surveys existing multi-large language model (LLM) agent applications, comparing systems that incorporate active human participation with those that operate fully autonomously within digital health contexts. Building on this analysis, we conduct an early exploration of human-in-the-loop feedback in multi-LLM interactions for emotion and human behaviour understanding using a subset of the FairytaleQA dataset. We further propose the HAMAgent framework to investigate how human feedback influences multi-agent reasoning and performance. Our preliminary experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of integrating human guidance into multi-LLM workflows and provide insights for designing effective human-in-the-loop systems in digital health. We conclude by discussing the key implications of our findings and outlining future directions for multi-agent LLM systems enhanced with human input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.