ReviewComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2026
The neural and physiological mechanisms of Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI): A systematic review and integrated framework.
Review in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs) have demonstrated therapeutic benefits across various clinical populations, yet the underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Prior research examined peripheral biomarkers but lacked integration with central nervous system processes. This preregistered systematic review aims to describe, evaluate, and synthesize evidence on the neural and physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of AAI. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched ProQuest, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus through November 2025 using three concept groups: animal interventions, neurological measures, and physiological measures. Inclusion criteria required empirical studies that measured neurological or physiological outcomes from structured AAIs using live animals. Thirty-four studies were obtained after screening (seven neuroimaging and twenty-seven biomarker studies). Results: Neuroimaging findings indicated increased functional connectivity within emotion regulation (prefrontal-amygdala) and reward circuits (caudate, striatum), associated with symptom improvement in ADHD, PTSD, and internet gaming disorder. Salivary cortisol concentrations decreased in 64.3% of studies, and salivary oxytocin concentrations increased in 60%. Autonomic outcomes were inconsistent, likely due to methodological heterogeneity. Conclusions: AAIs modulate fronto-limbic circuitry and HPA-axis activity through enhanced prefrontal-amygdala connectivity, reward circuit activation, cortisol reduction, and an increase in oxytocin. These mechanisms collectively contribute to symptom reduction in mood and stress-related disorders. Future research requires larger RCTs with integrated multimodal assessments to establish causal pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.