Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494984›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2026

Predictive deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced mammography for breast cancer diagnosis: a pilot study.

Roberto Maroncelli, Chiara De Nardo, Veronica Rizzo, Federica Cicciarelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Federica Pediconi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberto MaroncelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6626-2478
Chiara De NardoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-1098
Veronica RizzoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-3174
Federica CicciarelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7566-1798
Marcella PasculliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-649X
Francesca GalatiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-2856
Federica PediconiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza-University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-2137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The interpretation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images heavily depends on radiologists' expertise, highlighting the need for automated tools to assist clinical decision-making. This pilot study aimed to develop a deep learning model using CEM images to predict the histological diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent CEM followed by histopathological assessment (October 2022-May 2023) across 2 centers. CEM images from center 1 were used for model development, including training and 10-fold cross-validation, while images from center 2 served as an independent external test set. The breast region was manually segmented, and 2 deep learning architectures were implemented as ensemble classifiers, using biopsy results as reference standard. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: A total of 106 CEM images were retrospectively analyzed (50 from center 1 and 56 from center 2), obtained using different mammography systems. Histopathology identified 51 lesions (48%) as malignant and 55 (52%) as benign. Cross-validation yielded an ROC-AUC of 75% [58.4-91.6], accuracy of 68.7% [58.3-79], sensitivity of 68.9% [52.2-85.6], specificity of 67.8% [65.4-70.2], PPV of 69.3% [55.5-83.1], and NPV of 73.5% [55.2-91.8] ( Conclusions: The study showed promising performance but requires further development and dataset expansion. The model has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice. Advances in knowledge: A deep learning model based on CEM provides a tool to support physicians in the decision-making process and reduce invasiveness in breast cancer management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancercontrast enhanced mammographydeep learningdigital breast tomosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID42494984
PMCPMC13394488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.