ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Robotic Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Scoliosis with Markedly Narrow Chest.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobotic-assisted aortic valve replacement (AVR) has emerged as an extension of minimally invasive cardiac surgery, offering enhanced visualization and articulated instrument control. However, patients with severe thoracic deformities and markedly narrow chest anatomy are generally considered challenging candidates because restricted operative space may compromise annular exposure, instrument maneuverability, and aortotomy closure. Reports describing robotic-assisted AVR in such patients remain limited. We describe a successful robotic-assisted AVR in a patient with severe scoliosis and a markedly narrow thoracic cavity, highlighting technical modifications that enabled safe valve implantation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old man presented with progressive exertional dyspnea and fatigue caused by severe aortic regurgitation. CT demonstrated severe scoliosis with marked narrowing of the thoracic cavity, resulting in a sternovertebral distance of 6.5 cm. The patient also had a stable chronic type B aortic dissection extending from the descending thoracic aorta to the level of the superior mesenteric artery without involvement of the ascending aorta or aortic arch. After multidisciplinary discussion and informed consent, robotic-assisted AVR was performed using the da Vinci Xi system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Technical modifications included the placement of the service-port robotic arm in the fifth intercostal space to improve the working angle and avoid arm interference, and the creation of a longitudinal aortotomy to facilitate valve exposure in the restricted operative field. Exposure of the noncoronary and left coronary annulus was achieved through robotic retraction and bedside suction assistance. A 23-mm bioprosthetic valve was successfully implanted without intraoperative complications. The patient was extubated within 5 h and discharged on POD 20. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated normal prosthetic valve function without paravalvular leakage.
conclusionsRobotic-assisted AVR may be feasible in carefully selected patients with scoliosis-associated narrow chest anatomy. Detailed preoperative assessment and tailored technical strategies, including longitudinal aortotomy and modified port placement, may facilitate adequate exposure and safe valve implantation in anatomically challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.