Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

From the hospital to the community: reshaping the palliative care paradigm.

Carlos Laranjeira, Ana Ramos, Gisele Reami, Ana Querido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos LaranjeiraSchool of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Ana RamosSchool of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Gisele ReamiSchool of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Ana QueridoSchool of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care (PC) has traditionally developed within hospital settings, shaped by biomedical models, specialist hierarchies, and episodic care delivery. However, demographic change, rising multimorbidity, patient preferences, and health system constraints increasingly challenge hospital-centric approaches. In contrast, improving the community palliative care model requires moving beyond the simple decentralization of services toward a more integrated, person-centered, and ethically grounded system of care. At its core, an effective community model must recognize the individuality of people living with serious illness and respond to their needs across time, relationships, and care settings rather than in isolated clinical encounters. This perspective paper argues that a paradigm shift from hospital-based to community-anchored PC is no mere organizational adjustment but requires a conceptual transformation. Drawing on recent evidence and global policy frameworks, the paper explores the drivers, opportunities, and tensions of community-based PC, highlighting implications for clinical practice, professional roles, health systems, and communities. The transition between models is framed as a reorientation toward continuity, relational care, and shared responsibility, requiring new forms of integration between specialist services, primary care, and civil society.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesPalliative CareHumansPatient-Centered Carecare transitioncommunitycompassionate movementpalliative careperson-centered approach

Identifiers

PMID42494900
PMCPMC13391246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.