ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Stakeholder perspectives on job analysis for disability-inclusive sewing employment in China: a qualitative content analysis.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study explored stakeholder-informed perspectives on sewing employment in China, with a focus on employment-related factors, critical work tasks, and job demand domains. The findings were intended to inform future vocational evaluation and the development of AI-enhanced job analysis approaches for people with disabilities. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study using qualitative content analysis was conducted. Data were collected through three dyadic stakeholder interviews, each involving one sewing worker and one manager, and four one-on-one semi-structured interviews with vocational rehabilitation professionals. Results: The analysis identified fourteen employment-related categories, four critical work tasks, and four job demand domains relevant to sewing work. Conclusion: This study identified employment-related categories, critical work tasks, and job demand domains in disability-inclusive sewing employment in China. These findings may inform future vocational evaluation and AI-enhanced job analysis, with video-based analysis positioned as a complementary tool for quantifying observable physical job demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.