Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494821›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in epidemiology2026

Navigating a new era in cardiovascular disease epidemiology: big data, artificial intelligence and the imperative of disability inclusion.

Theophilus I Emeto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Theophilus I EmetoPublic Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of premature global mortality and one of the largest contributors to disability-adjusted life years lost. Over the past decade, the field has been transformed by the convergence of population biobanks, deep learning applied to imaging and electrocardiography, polygenic risk scores, wearable biosensors, and methodological advances in causal inference and target trial emulation. These innovations are reshaping precision public health for the general population. Yet the gains have not been equitably distributed. People with disability (PwD), comprising approximately 16 per cent of the global population and recognised by the United States National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities as a population experiencing health disparities are systematically under-represented in clinical trials, biobanks, electronic health records and the artificial-intelligence (AI) models trained upon them. Their cardiovascular health is therefore both worse and less precisely characterised than that of the general population. This article maps the key methodological vectors of change in CVD epidemiology, explains why each has so far failed to reach PwD, and presents a layered, defendable framework for disability-inclusive big-data and AI-enabled CVD research. It argues that disability inclusion is not a peripheral equity concern but a stress-test for the validity, generalisability and ethical legitimacy of the entire precision-cardiovascular enterprise.

Indexed as

algorithmic fairnessartificial intelligencebig datacardiovascular epidemiologydisabilityFAIR data principleshealth equitypolygenic risk score

Identifiers

PMID42494821
PMCPMC13391520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.