ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2026
Biomedical ethics and regulatory capacity building in Africa: the case study of São Tomé and Príncipe.
Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Biomedical Ethics and Regulatory Capacity Building for Portuguese Speaking African Countries (BERC-Luso) Project aimed to strengthen biomedical ethics and regulatory capacity in Lusophone African Countries. At the legislative level, it promoted the alignment of national laws with international best practices for biomedical research. At the institutional level, it promoted the establishment and strengthening of National Regulatory Authorities (NRA) and National Ethics Committees (NECs). This project also included professional training to enhance national expertise; however, this article focused primarily on the legislative and institutional developments achieved in São Tomé and Príncipe. It examines how capacity building translated into national regulatory reform. At the project's onset, São Tomé and Príncipe had minimal legislative and institutional frameworks and no specific authorities or legislation in the field. Despite these shortcomings, political commitment and stakeholder engagement enabled major developments. The country established an NEC for scientific research, competent in clinical research oversight and advanced the legal and institutional proposal for an NRA, setting key building blocks for future clinical trials. These advancements underline the transformative potential of capacity-building programs in resource-limited settings. This experience may serve as a model for similar initiatives in countries seeking to strengthen ethical and regulatory frameworks for biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.