ArticleCureus2026
The Effect of Screen Exposure and Early Language Stimulation on Language and Social Development of Children.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Excessive screen exposure during infancy and early childhood is linked to delayed language and social milestones. Prospective observational data regarding how natural, self-selected variations in screen reduction and caregiver-led language stimulation impact real-world milestones development remain limited. Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the association between changes in screen exposure and caregiver language stimulation on language and social development in nine- to 18-month-old children who were initially exposed to excessive screen time. Methodology In this prospective cohort study, 72 children aged 9-18 months with a baseline screen exposure of more than two hours/day were followed up in a tertiary care hospital. During the six-month follow-up, we did not implement interventions or prescribe treatments but rather observed families and stratified them into two exposure cohorts based on validated monthly lifestyle diaries: Cohort A (spontaneous screen reduction to less than one hour/day plus natural early language stimulation by "serve-and-return" interactions, n=36): and Cohort B (spontaneous screen reduction only without structured language stimulation routines, n=36). Development was assessed using the Language Evaluation Scale Trivandrum (LEST) and Home Screen Questionnaire (HSQ) at baseline and at six months. We used multivariable linear regression to adjust for baseline confounders, including parental education and household socioeconomic status. Results At six-month follow-up, Cohort A infants had a significantly greater mean increase in overall LEST+HSQ scores than Cohort B (+16.3 vs. +7.4, p<0.001). After controlling for baseline demographics, Cohort A had significantly higher language scores in the independent domain (30.2±3.4 vs. 24.8±3.9, p<0.001) and social communication scores (28.2±3.1 vs. 24.4±3.5, p<0.001) than Cohort B. Conclusions Combining natural caregiver interaction with structured language stimulation and reduced screen time is much more associated with better language and social development outcomes than reducing screen time alone. Clinicians should emphasize the promotion of increased caregiver interaction during early childhood along with screen time restriction rather than screen restriction alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.