Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Loneliness, rumination, and adolescent psychological crisis in China: a pilot moderated mediation study.

Huifang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Huifang ChengDepartment of General Education Research, Zhengzhou Police University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescent psychological crisis-encompassing depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideation-is a major public health challenge. One in five adolescents experiences a clinically significant mental health condition globally. Loneliness is a well-documented, modifiable risk factor for these outcomes. However, the exact cognitive-emotional pathways linking loneliness to acute psychological crisis remain unclear. This is particularly true in China, where rapid social change and intense academic pressure increasingly strain adolescent mental health. We do not yet fully understand how protective resources might buffer these specific pathways. Objectives and methods: This pilot study tests a moderated mediation model based on the Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness and the stress-vulnerability framework. We investigate ruminative thinking as a cognitive-emotional mediator between loneliness and psychological crisis. We also test whether perceived social support and psychological resilience moderate distinct stages of this pathway. Based on a pilot sample of Results: Loneliness is significantly associated with depressive symptoms (β = 0.43, Conclusions: These preliminary, exploratory findings are consistent with the possibility that ruminative thinking partially accounts for the cross-sectional association between loneliness and adolescent psychological crisis in China, and with social support and resilience attenuating this association at potentially distinct stages. Because the pilot is underpowered for the moderated mediation model and the available longitudinal evidence covers depression only, the moderation and stage-specificity results should be read as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. A planned full-scale study (

Indexed as

adolescent mental healthChinalonelinessmoderated mediationpilot studypsychological crisisresiliencerumination

Identifiers

PMID42494737
PMCPMC13391944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.