ArticleVeterinary world2026
Fermented cassava peel with
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The utilization of agro-industrial by-products as alternative feed ingredients has gained increasing attention in poultry production. Cassava peel is abundant but limited by high fiber and anti-nutritional factors. Fermentation using Materials and Methods: A total of broilers were randomly assigned to five dietary treatments: FCP0, FCP5, FCP10, FCP15, and FCP20, representing 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% inclusion levels of FCP in the diet. The experiment was conducted over 35 days, including starter and finisher phases. Parameters measured included average daily weight gain (ADWG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), live body weight (LBW), carcass characteristics, immune organ weights, intestinal villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), VH/CD ratio, gut microbiota, blood lipid profile, and thigh meat fatty acid composition. Results: Dietary inclusion of FCP significantly improved ADWG and LBW, particularly at the 20% level, without affecting ADFI and FCR. Carcass weight and percentage increased significantly (p < 0.05), while abdominal fat and physiological organs remained unaffected. Thymus weight and percentage were significantly increased, indicating enhanced immune response. Intestinal morphology showed increased VH and VH/CD ratio and decreased CD, reflecting improved absorptive capacity. Microbial analysis revealed reduced Conclusion: FCP is an effective functional feed ingredient that enhances growth performance, gut health, immune status, and lipid metabolism in broiler chickens. Inclusion up to 20% can be recommended as a sustainable and economically viable strategy to improve poultry productivity and meat quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.