ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Dual-view weakly-supervised learning for apple tree flower counting.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a method to estimate apple tree flower cluster count using image analysis techniques. The main research question is how accurately flower clusters on apple trees can be counted using a camera-based approach and weakly-supervised learning, compared to traditional visual estimation. A camera is used to capture images of blooming apple trees from two sides. These images are processed by a weakly-supervised model based on a ResNet feature extractor and a feature pyramid network serving as the feature aggregator. The model is trained and validated using reference data obtained through manual flower cluster counts in the orchard and from estimations based on camera images. The model was trained using field-validated data and visually-estimated data, enabling a comparative evaluation. The proposed model surpassed conventional image segmentation methods in estimating both manually counted and visually estimated flower clusters. The proposed method achieves a relative error of 10.26% in estimating flower cluster quantities, demonstrating its effectiveness and improved accuracy over traditional approaches. Its reliance on field-validated reference data adds to its robustness and practical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.