ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Estimating maize canopy water content using UAV-based multispectral-thermal infrared imagery and canopy signal distributional features.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Canopy water content (CWC) is an important indicator of crop water status **and** supports precision irrigation decision-making. Plot-level CWC estimation using UAV imagery often relies on canopy mean features, whereas the role of within-plot canopy-signal distributional information remains insufficiently examined. Methods: In this study, spring maize at the Shiyanghe site was monitored using UAV-based multispectral and thermal infrared imagery. Mean, percentile, and dispersion features were extracted from effective canopy pixels within each plot. RFECV feature selection, 50 repeated random train-test splits, paired statistical tests, simulated spatial aggregation, and four regression models were used to evaluate the stage- and scale-dependent contribution of these features. Results and discussion: Water stress affected both overall spectral-thermal responses and within-plot signal distributions. Before tasseling, percentile and dispersion features were frequently selected and provided complementary information, especially for tree-based models and finer aggregation scales. After tasseling, mean features generally showed more stable performance, although some distributional features still contained CWC-related information. The supplementary Xinxiang site-internal analysis suggested that, under weak water-gradient and small-sample conditions, distributional features may be frequently selected but may not consistently improve prediction accuracy. Overall, the contribution of distributional features was growth-stage-, scale-, and model-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.