Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Smart FL: meta-learning for federated blood marrow smear classification.

N Ilakiyaselvan, Srivastava Sanskar, D Aarthi, V Kalyanasundaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N IlakiyaselvanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Srivastava SanskarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
D AarthiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
V KalyanasundaramSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of bone marrow cells is crucial for diagnosing hematological disorders, yet integrating machine learning and deep learning models into clinical practice faces hurdles like data privacy and data scarcity. Existing models often lack the adaptability that is important in the medical field, limiting their practicality. This study introduces an approach using federated learning and meta-learning to tackle these challenges. The objectives for this study were multifaceted. Firstly, it address the adverse effects of data scarcity commonly found in medical datasets due to which models are unable to predict classes which do not have enough examples. Secondly, this study tackles the privacy concerns by adopting a federated learning framework, allowing model training without centralizing sensitive data. Additionally, the goal is to make the federated process personalized to each client for enhancing individual accuracy. Lastly, this study seeks to improve the generalization capabilities of the models, enabling robust performance across diverse patient populations. The proposed approach involves leveraging a ResNet-18 backbone for the meta-learning algorithm, specifically one based on prototypical networks. This framework is then implemented and tested in a federated manner using FedAvg across four clients, each possessing their own data. The main focus of this research is to achieve high accuracy, particularly in unseen classes with limited samples. This approach yields promising results, achieving an accuracy of 96 ± 1% in classes with low sample sizes. Through this approach, hospitals, clinics, and researchers can make sure that their data remains private while being able to benefit from deep learning research.

Indexed as

bone marrow cell classificationFedAvgfederated learningmeta-learningprototypical networks

Identifiers

PMID42494615
PMCPMC13391540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.