ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Development and validation of a machine learning-based early warning model for bone metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone metastasis (BM) is common in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in patients with advanced disease at presentation. However, the indications for bone scintigraphy remain inconsistent and may lead to unnecessary imaging in low-risk patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for individualized prediction of BM in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 327 patients with newly diagnosed PCa from two tertiary hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 229) and an internal validation set (n = 98). The Boruta algorithm was used to identify significant predictors. Seven machine learning models, including random forest and logistic regression, were developed and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The best-performing model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and deployed as an online prediction tool. Results: Six predictors were identified by the Boruta algorithm: clinical T stage, Gleason score, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), regional lymph node metastasis, and fibrinogen. Among the seven models, the random forest model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.902 in the training set and 0.906 in the internal validation set. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and decision curve analysis indicated favorable clinical utility. An interactive online prediction tool was developed for individualized risk estimation. Conclusion: We developed and internally validated an interpretable random forest model for predicting BM in newly diagnosed PCa. This model may help identify high-risk patients and guide the use of bone scintigraphy. Prospective multicenter studies with external validation are needed to further confirm its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.