Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494565›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in personality psychology2026

"I have problems and I have fun": Funniness ratings of memes about psychological problems reflect how people relate them to themselves and correlate with rumination, reflection, self-liking, and self-competence.

Łukasz Jach, Natalia Lenart, Dagna J Kocur, Paulina Wardawy-Dudziak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in personality psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Łukasz JachUniversity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-0795
Natalia LenartUniversity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Dagna J KocurUniversity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-4579
Paulina Wardawy-DudziakUniversity of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-9809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome internet memes relate to specific psychological problems, such as pessimism, anxiety, procrastination, depression, masking feelings, social isolation, and coping with problems. We compared participants' funniness ratings and perceived self-relatedness of these memes, moderated by humor styles. Moreover, we investigated the relationships between ratings of the funniness and relatedness of memes and cognitive processes of rumination and reflection and participants' self-liking and self-competence, controlling for humor styles. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: A sample of 225 Polish participants (58 men and 167 women) aged 20 to 35 (

resultsParticipants found memes about depression the funniest, and they found procrastination memes the most relatable to their situation. Rumination correlated more with relating memes about psychological problems to one's situation, and reflection correlated more with ratings of the funniness of these memes. Self-liking and self-competence correlated negatively with ratings of the funniness and relatedness of memes about psychological problems. Affiliative humor predicted relatedness of psychological problems memes negatively, and aggressive and self-defeating humor predicted such relatedness positively.

conclusionsOur study is the first to examine perceptions of internet memes about a broad range of psychological problems. Our results show the interplay between psychological variables and the reception of humorous messages about serious contemporary issues.

Indexed as

humor stylesinternet memesreflection and rumination processesself-competenceself-liking

Identifiers

PMID42494565
PMCPMC13392671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.