ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome across 22 VEGF-pathway inhibitors in the FDA adverse event reporting system: reporting patterns and reporting-interval characteristics.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare but potentially severe complication of VEGF-pathway inhibition. A recent FAERS analysis supported PRES as a probable class effect of angiogenesis inhibitors but found no association with continuous VEGFR affinity, did not formally test a categorical VEGFR-2 selectivity contrast, and could not characterise time to onset. Complementing that work, we compared disproportionality signals across 22 VEGFi/VEGFRi agents and examined whether signal ranking tracked VEGFR-2 selectivity, systemic exposure, and published case-report volume. Methods: In this observational pharmacovigilance study we analysed FAERS reports (2010-Q1 to 2026-Q1) via the openFDA API. PRES was ascertained by MedDRA Preferred Terms. Four disproportionality metrics (ROR, PRR, BCPNN-IC with IC025, EBGM) were computed for each agent; robust signals were confirmed by Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg correction. We characterised the drug-start-to-FDA-receipt reporting interval (a reporting-delay measure, not true clinical time-to-onset), explored the correlation between published VEGFR-2 IC50 and log-ROR, and performed a targeted PubMed scan against the case-report literature. Results: Under formal multiplicity correction (Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg), 13 of 16 evaluable agents produced robust elevated PRES signals (ROR up to 16.68). Signal intensity separated cleanly by VEGFR-2 selectivity: every highly selective VEGFR-TKI (tivozanib, lenvatinib, fruquintinib, axitinib; ROR 9.74-16.68) ranked above every multi-kinase agent (ROR 2.00-6.05) (Mann-Whitney p = 0.005; Spearman rho = 0.84, p = 0.001). By contrast, the continuous IC50-ROR correlation was non-significant primarily (rho = -0.38, p = 0.25) and exclusion-sensitive, hence hypothesis-generating only. Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents produced no positive signal, an internal negative control. Nintedanib yielded an inverse signal (ROR 0.34), likely indication channelling. Tivozanib and ramucirumab (ROR 7.56) were under-represented in the PubMed case-report literature (FAERS-PubMed rho = 0.09, p = 0.78). Conclusion: PRES disproportionality varied substantially across VEGFi/VEGFRi agents, with intravitreal agents serving as an internal negative control consistent with a systemic-exposure mechanism. IC50-based analyses were small-sample and hypothesis-generating only. Tivozanib and ramucirumab emerged as under-represented signals meriting confirmation; selective VEGFR-TKI recipients may warrant close blood-pressure monitoring and a low threshold for neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.