Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494518›Full record

ReviewGenetics in medicine open2026

Patient and health care practitioner experiences and perspectives on expanded carrier screening: A scoping review.

Sakina Walji, Sahana Kukan, Amanda L Terry, Judith Belle Brown, June C Carroll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sakina WaljiRay D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sahana KukanRay D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amanda L TerryCenter for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Judith Belle BrownCenter for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
June C CarrollRay D. Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carrier screening identifies individuals/couples at risk for autosomal recessive conditions, and expanded or universal approaches are increasingly being recommended. Implementation poses clinical, ethical, and logistical challenges that remain underexplored. This scoping review synthesized patient/public and health care practitioner experiences and perspectives on expanded carrier screening (ECS) and universal carrier screening. A search of 4 databases identified 1433 records, plus 19 additional studies. After screening and full-text review (112 articles), 45 studies were included in this review. Content analysis was conducted, and findings were mapped to the theoretical domains framework to guide implementation. Six major categories were identified: (1) attitudes and awareness of screening; (2) barriers and concerns regarding ECS decision-making; (3) personal and broader public-health benefits; (4) ethical, psychological, and equity considerations; (5) infrastructure, clinical, and policy considerations; and (6) research gaps and future directions. Key theoretical domains framework domains included beliefs about consequences, environmental context and resources, social/professional role and identity, and emotion. Engagement with ECS/ universal carrier screening is shaped by intersecting emotional, ethical, and systemic factors. The findings support behaviorally informed strategies and identify critical priorities for future research, education, and policy development.

Indexed as

Carrier ScreeningEthical legal and social implicationsReproductive screeningScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42494518
PMCPMC13393777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.